Review





Similar Products

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti ncor1 primary antibody
Anti Ncor1 Primary Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ncor1 primary antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ncor1 primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech ncor
GPX4 suppression is regulated by a repressive complex containing MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 and <t>NCoR.</t> (a) Peak plot showing the ATAC-seq peak at the Gpx4 locus (Chr10: 80051488–80056439) in ovarian tissues from control (Ctrl, blue) and DHEA-treated (DHEA, red) mice. Orange boxes and asterisks denote regions with increased chromatin accessibility. (b) A heatmap displays the top six transcription factors (TFs) binding to the Gpx4 promoter region in the ATAC-seq analysis, along with the mRNA expression identified by RNA-seq analysis, and the predicted TF motifs and E-values are shown on the right. (c) Schematic representation of the Gpx4 promoter region showing the MAZ binding motif relative to the transcription start site (TSS). (Below) MAZ binding footprint enrichment at the Gpx4 locus in Ctrl (blue) and DHEA-treated (red) mice. Primary ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) were treated with 50 μM DHEA for 48 h in vitro to establish the PCOS model. (d) Western blot analysis of MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of one sample per group. Quantification was presented as means ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, Student's t-test. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with isoform-matched immunoglobulin (Ig) <t>or</t> <t>antibodies</t> (IP Ab) to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR, and then immunoprecipitants were assessed for MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR by western blotting reciprocally (the upper panel). The non-IP lysates (Input) were assayed for GAPDH as input controls. (f) Immunofluorescence co-staining was used to determine the expression and localization of MAZ (green), NCoR (red), and HDAC3 (magenta) within GCs. (g) Quantification of protein co-localization from the magnified region in ( f ). (h) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. DHEA-treated GCs were in presence or absence of KCC-07 (KCC, 10 μM, 48 h), and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with isoform-matched immunoglobulin or antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, NCoR, HDAC3, or pan-acetylated lysine (Pan-Ace), respectively. The genomic DNA (Input) and the antibody-bound DNAs were PCR-amplified with primers covering the MAZ motif on Gpx4 promoter. The PCR products of representative sample per group were analyzed on 1.5 % agarose gels. Quantitative analysis was shown on the right. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (i) Western blot analysis. (Left) HDAC3 and GPX4 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs in the presence or absence of the HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 (RGFP, 10 μM, 48 h). (Middle) MAZ and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or MAZ-targeting (si-MAZ) siRNA, followed by treatment with or without DHEA. (Right) NCoR and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or NCoR-targeting (si-NCoR) siRNA, followed by DHEA treatment. GAPDH was as a loading control. (j) Quantifications of ( i ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (k) Schematic model of Gpx4 transcriptional repression. A transcriptional repressive complex orchestrated by MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, and NCoR binds to the hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, leading to transcriptional suppression.
Ncor, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ncor/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ncor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech isotype matched immunoglobulin ig
GPX4 suppression is regulated by a repressive complex containing MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 and NCoR. (a) Peak plot showing the ATAC-seq peak at the Gpx4 locus (Chr10: 80051488–80056439) in ovarian tissues from control (Ctrl, blue) and DHEA-treated (DHEA, red) mice. Orange boxes and asterisks denote regions with increased chromatin accessibility. (b) A heatmap displays the top six transcription factors (TFs) binding to the Gpx4 promoter region in the ATAC-seq analysis, along with the mRNA expression identified by RNA-seq analysis, and the predicted TF motifs and E-values are shown on the right. (c) Schematic representation of the Gpx4 promoter region showing the MAZ binding motif relative to the transcription start site (TSS). (Below) MAZ binding footprint enrichment at the Gpx4 locus in Ctrl (blue) and DHEA-treated (red) mice. Primary ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) were treated with 50 μM DHEA for 48 h in vitro to establish the PCOS model. (d) Western blot analysis of MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of one sample per group. Quantification was presented as means ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, Student's t-test. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with isoform-matched <t>immunoglobulin</t> (Ig) or antibodies (IP Ab) to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR, and then immunoprecipitants were assessed for MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR by western blotting reciprocally (the upper panel). The non-IP lysates (Input) were assayed for GAPDH as input controls. (f) Immunofluorescence co-staining was used to determine the expression and localization of MAZ (green), NCoR (red), and HDAC3 (magenta) within GCs. (g) Quantification of protein co-localization from the magnified region in ( f ). (h) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. DHEA-treated GCs were in presence or absence of KCC-07 (KCC, 10 μM, 48 h), and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with isoform-matched immunoglobulin or antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, NCoR, HDAC3, or pan-acetylated lysine (Pan-Ace), respectively. The genomic DNA (Input) and the antibody-bound DNAs were PCR-amplified with primers covering the MAZ motif on Gpx4 promoter. The PCR products of representative sample per group were analyzed on 1.5 % agarose gels. Quantitative analysis was shown on the right. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (i) Western blot analysis. (Left) HDAC3 and GPX4 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs in the presence or absence of the HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 (RGFP, 10 μM, 48 h). (Middle) MAZ and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or MAZ-targeting (si-MAZ) siRNA, followed by treatment with or without DHEA. (Right) NCoR and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or NCoR-targeting (si-NCoR) siRNA, followed by DHEA treatment. GAPDH was as a loading control. (j) Quantifications of ( i ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (k) Schematic model of Gpx4 transcriptional repression. A transcriptional repressive complex orchestrated by MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, and NCoR binds to the hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, leading to transcriptional suppression.
Isotype Matched Immunoglobulin Ig, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/isotype matched immunoglobulin ig/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
isotype matched immunoglobulin ig - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bethyl anti ncor1
GPX4 suppression is regulated by a repressive complex containing MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 and NCoR. (a) Peak plot showing the ATAC-seq peak at the Gpx4 locus (Chr10: 80051488–80056439) in ovarian tissues from control (Ctrl, blue) and DHEA-treated (DHEA, red) mice. Orange boxes and asterisks denote regions with increased chromatin accessibility. (b) A heatmap displays the top six transcription factors (TFs) binding to the Gpx4 promoter region in the ATAC-seq analysis, along with the mRNA expression identified by RNA-seq analysis, and the predicted TF motifs and E-values are shown on the right. (c) Schematic representation of the Gpx4 promoter region showing the MAZ binding motif relative to the transcription start site (TSS). (Below) MAZ binding footprint enrichment at the Gpx4 locus in Ctrl (blue) and DHEA-treated (red) mice. Primary ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) were treated with 50 μM DHEA for 48 h in vitro to establish the PCOS model. (d) Western blot analysis of MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of one sample per group. Quantification was presented as means ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, Student's t-test. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with isoform-matched <t>immunoglobulin</t> (Ig) or antibodies (IP Ab) to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR, and then immunoprecipitants were assessed for MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR by western blotting reciprocally (the upper panel). The non-IP lysates (Input) were assayed for GAPDH as input controls. (f) Immunofluorescence co-staining was used to determine the expression and localization of MAZ (green), NCoR (red), and HDAC3 (magenta) within GCs. (g) Quantification of protein co-localization from the magnified region in ( f ). (h) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. DHEA-treated GCs were in presence or absence of KCC-07 (KCC, 10 μM, 48 h), and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with isoform-matched immunoglobulin or antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, NCoR, HDAC3, or pan-acetylated lysine (Pan-Ace), respectively. The genomic DNA (Input) and the antibody-bound DNAs were PCR-amplified with primers covering the MAZ motif on Gpx4 promoter. The PCR products of representative sample per group were analyzed on 1.5 % agarose gels. Quantitative analysis was shown on the right. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (i) Western blot analysis. (Left) HDAC3 and GPX4 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs in the presence or absence of the HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 (RGFP, 10 μM, 48 h). (Middle) MAZ and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or MAZ-targeting (si-MAZ) siRNA, followed by treatment with or without DHEA. (Right) NCoR and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or NCoR-targeting (si-NCoR) siRNA, followed by DHEA treatment. GAPDH was as a loading control. (j) Quantifications of ( i ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (k) Schematic model of Gpx4 transcriptional repression. A transcriptional repressive complex orchestrated by MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, and NCoR binds to the hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, leading to transcriptional suppression.
Anti Ncor1, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ncor1/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ncor1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti ncor1
GPX4 suppression is regulated by a repressive complex containing MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 and NCoR. (a) Peak plot showing the ATAC-seq peak at the Gpx4 locus (Chr10: 80051488–80056439) in ovarian tissues from control (Ctrl, blue) and DHEA-treated (DHEA, red) mice. Orange boxes and asterisks denote regions with increased chromatin accessibility. (b) A heatmap displays the top six transcription factors (TFs) binding to the Gpx4 promoter region in the ATAC-seq analysis, along with the mRNA expression identified by RNA-seq analysis, and the predicted TF motifs and E-values are shown on the right. (c) Schematic representation of the Gpx4 promoter region showing the MAZ binding motif relative to the transcription start site (TSS). (Below) MAZ binding footprint enrichment at the Gpx4 locus in Ctrl (blue) and DHEA-treated (red) mice. Primary ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) were treated with 50 μM DHEA for 48 h in vitro to establish the PCOS model. (d) Western blot analysis of MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of one sample per group. Quantification was presented as means ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, Student's t-test. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with isoform-matched <t>immunoglobulin</t> (Ig) or antibodies (IP Ab) to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR, and then immunoprecipitants were assessed for MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR by western blotting reciprocally (the upper panel). The non-IP lysates (Input) were assayed for GAPDH as input controls. (f) Immunofluorescence co-staining was used to determine the expression and localization of MAZ (green), NCoR (red), and HDAC3 (magenta) within GCs. (g) Quantification of protein co-localization from the magnified region in ( f ). (h) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. DHEA-treated GCs were in presence or absence of KCC-07 (KCC, 10 μM, 48 h), and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with isoform-matched immunoglobulin or antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, NCoR, HDAC3, or pan-acetylated lysine (Pan-Ace), respectively. The genomic DNA (Input) and the antibody-bound DNAs were PCR-amplified with primers covering the MAZ motif on Gpx4 promoter. The PCR products of representative sample per group were analyzed on 1.5 % agarose gels. Quantitative analysis was shown on the right. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (i) Western blot analysis. (Left) HDAC3 and GPX4 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs in the presence or absence of the HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 (RGFP, 10 μM, 48 h). (Middle) MAZ and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or MAZ-targeting (si-MAZ) siRNA, followed by treatment with or without DHEA. (Right) NCoR and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or NCoR-targeting (si-NCoR) siRNA, followed by DHEA treatment. GAPDH was as a loading control. (j) Quantifications of ( i ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (k) Schematic model of Gpx4 transcriptional repression. A transcriptional repressive complex orchestrated by MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, and NCoR binds to the hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, leading to transcriptional suppression.
Anti Ncor1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ncor1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ncor1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


GPX4 suppression is regulated by a repressive complex containing MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 and NCoR. (a) Peak plot showing the ATAC-seq peak at the Gpx4 locus (Chr10: 80051488–80056439) in ovarian tissues from control (Ctrl, blue) and DHEA-treated (DHEA, red) mice. Orange boxes and asterisks denote regions with increased chromatin accessibility. (b) A heatmap displays the top six transcription factors (TFs) binding to the Gpx4 promoter region in the ATAC-seq analysis, along with the mRNA expression identified by RNA-seq analysis, and the predicted TF motifs and E-values are shown on the right. (c) Schematic representation of the Gpx4 promoter region showing the MAZ binding motif relative to the transcription start site (TSS). (Below) MAZ binding footprint enrichment at the Gpx4 locus in Ctrl (blue) and DHEA-treated (red) mice. Primary ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) were treated with 50 μM DHEA for 48 h in vitro to establish the PCOS model. (d) Western blot analysis of MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of one sample per group. Quantification was presented as means ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, Student's t-test. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with isoform-matched immunoglobulin (Ig) or antibodies (IP Ab) to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR, and then immunoprecipitants were assessed for MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR by western blotting reciprocally (the upper panel). The non-IP lysates (Input) were assayed for GAPDH as input controls. (f) Immunofluorescence co-staining was used to determine the expression and localization of MAZ (green), NCoR (red), and HDAC3 (magenta) within GCs. (g) Quantification of protein co-localization from the magnified region in ( f ). (h) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. DHEA-treated GCs were in presence or absence of KCC-07 (KCC, 10 μM, 48 h), and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with isoform-matched immunoglobulin or antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, NCoR, HDAC3, or pan-acetylated lysine (Pan-Ace), respectively. The genomic DNA (Input) and the antibody-bound DNAs were PCR-amplified with primers covering the MAZ motif on Gpx4 promoter. The PCR products of representative sample per group were analyzed on 1.5 % agarose gels. Quantitative analysis was shown on the right. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (i) Western blot analysis. (Left) HDAC3 and GPX4 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs in the presence or absence of the HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 (RGFP, 10 μM, 48 h). (Middle) MAZ and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or MAZ-targeting (si-MAZ) siRNA, followed by treatment with or without DHEA. (Right) NCoR and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or NCoR-targeting (si-NCoR) siRNA, followed by DHEA treatment. GAPDH was as a loading control. (j) Quantifications of ( i ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (k) Schematic model of Gpx4 transcriptional repression. A transcriptional repressive complex orchestrated by MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, and NCoR binds to the hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, leading to transcriptional suppression.

Journal: Redox Biology

Article Title: Methylation reader MBD2-mediated GPX4 transcriptional repression drives ovarian granulosa cell ferroptosis in PCOS

doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104034

Figure Lengend Snippet: GPX4 suppression is regulated by a repressive complex containing MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 and NCoR. (a) Peak plot showing the ATAC-seq peak at the Gpx4 locus (Chr10: 80051488–80056439) in ovarian tissues from control (Ctrl, blue) and DHEA-treated (DHEA, red) mice. Orange boxes and asterisks denote regions with increased chromatin accessibility. (b) A heatmap displays the top six transcription factors (TFs) binding to the Gpx4 promoter region in the ATAC-seq analysis, along with the mRNA expression identified by RNA-seq analysis, and the predicted TF motifs and E-values are shown on the right. (c) Schematic representation of the Gpx4 promoter region showing the MAZ binding motif relative to the transcription start site (TSS). (Below) MAZ binding footprint enrichment at the Gpx4 locus in Ctrl (blue) and DHEA-treated (red) mice. Primary ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) were treated with 50 μM DHEA for 48 h in vitro to establish the PCOS model. (d) Western blot analysis of MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of one sample per group. Quantification was presented as means ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, Student's t-test. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with isoform-matched immunoglobulin (Ig) or antibodies (IP Ab) to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR, and then immunoprecipitants were assessed for MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR by western blotting reciprocally (the upper panel). The non-IP lysates (Input) were assayed for GAPDH as input controls. (f) Immunofluorescence co-staining was used to determine the expression and localization of MAZ (green), NCoR (red), and HDAC3 (magenta) within GCs. (g) Quantification of protein co-localization from the magnified region in ( f ). (h) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. DHEA-treated GCs were in presence or absence of KCC-07 (KCC, 10 μM, 48 h), and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with isoform-matched immunoglobulin or antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, NCoR, HDAC3, or pan-acetylated lysine (Pan-Ace), respectively. The genomic DNA (Input) and the antibody-bound DNAs were PCR-amplified with primers covering the MAZ motif on Gpx4 promoter. The PCR products of representative sample per group were analyzed on 1.5 % agarose gels. Quantitative analysis was shown on the right. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (i) Western blot analysis. (Left) HDAC3 and GPX4 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs in the presence or absence of the HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 (RGFP, 10 μM, 48 h). (Middle) MAZ and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or MAZ-targeting (si-MAZ) siRNA, followed by treatment with or without DHEA. (Right) NCoR and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or NCoR-targeting (si-NCoR) siRNA, followed by DHEA treatment. GAPDH was as a loading control. (j) Quantifications of ( i ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (k) Schematic model of Gpx4 transcriptional repression. A transcriptional repressive complex orchestrated by MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, and NCoR binds to the hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, leading to transcriptional suppression.

Article Snippet: Antibodies against MBD2 ( AB188474 , ABclonal), MAZ (21068-1-AP, Proteintech, USA), NCoR (20018-1-AP, Proteintech, USA), HDAC3 (A19537, ABclonal, China), and Pan-Ace (HY– P80179 , MCE) were used for immunoprecipitation.

Techniques: Control, Binding Assay, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, In Vitro, Western Blot, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Amplification, Transfection

Granulosa GPX4 deletion blocks the anti-ferroptotic and ovary-protective effects of MBD2 inhibition in PCOS mice. Gpx4 fl/fl and Gpx4 GC−/− mice were grouped into oil vehicle control (Ctrl), DHEA (60 mg/kg, 21 days)-treated (DHEA), and DHEA-treated with KCC-07 (KCC, 10 mg/kg) treatment (KCC/DHEA) mice ( n = 6). (a) Representative photomicrographs of ovarian sections. Ovarian sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE; upper panels), Masson trichrome (middle panels), and TUNEL assay (lower panels). Asterisks indicate corpora lutea; black arrows indicate preantral follicles; yellow arrows indicate collagen deposits; white arrows indicate TUNEL-positive cells. (b) Quantification of ( a ). Box-and-whisker plots with data points ( n = 6). ∗ P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA. (c) Western blot analysis of GPX4, 4-HNE, Collagen I (Col1α) and α-SMA protein expression in ovarian tissues. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of two samples per group. (d) Quantification of ( c ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6. ∗ P < 0.05, two -way ANOVA. (e) A schematic diagram of sequential MBD2 elevation, formation of a transcriptional repressive complex with MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3, binding to the DNMT-hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, suppression of Gpx4 transcription, and granulosa cell ferroptosis that promotes polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (dashed lines). Conversely, MBD2 inhibition with KCC-07 blocks GPX4 suppression and ferroptotic PCOS (solid lines).

Journal: Redox Biology

Article Title: Methylation reader MBD2-mediated GPX4 transcriptional repression drives ovarian granulosa cell ferroptosis in PCOS

doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104034

Figure Lengend Snippet: Granulosa GPX4 deletion blocks the anti-ferroptotic and ovary-protective effects of MBD2 inhibition in PCOS mice. Gpx4 fl/fl and Gpx4 GC−/− mice were grouped into oil vehicle control (Ctrl), DHEA (60 mg/kg, 21 days)-treated (DHEA), and DHEA-treated with KCC-07 (KCC, 10 mg/kg) treatment (KCC/DHEA) mice ( n = 6). (a) Representative photomicrographs of ovarian sections. Ovarian sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE; upper panels), Masson trichrome (middle panels), and TUNEL assay (lower panels). Asterisks indicate corpora lutea; black arrows indicate preantral follicles; yellow arrows indicate collagen deposits; white arrows indicate TUNEL-positive cells. (b) Quantification of ( a ). Box-and-whisker plots with data points ( n = 6). ∗ P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA. (c) Western blot analysis of GPX4, 4-HNE, Collagen I (Col1α) and α-SMA protein expression in ovarian tissues. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of two samples per group. (d) Quantification of ( c ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6. ∗ P < 0.05, two -way ANOVA. (e) A schematic diagram of sequential MBD2 elevation, formation of a transcriptional repressive complex with MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3, binding to the DNMT-hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, suppression of Gpx4 transcription, and granulosa cell ferroptosis that promotes polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (dashed lines). Conversely, MBD2 inhibition with KCC-07 blocks GPX4 suppression and ferroptotic PCOS (solid lines).

Article Snippet: Antibodies against MBD2 ( AB188474 , ABclonal), MAZ (21068-1-AP, Proteintech, USA), NCoR (20018-1-AP, Proteintech, USA), HDAC3 (A19537, ABclonal, China), and Pan-Ace (HY– P80179 , MCE) were used for immunoprecipitation.

Techniques: Inhibition, Control, Staining, TUNEL Assay, Whisker Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Binding Assay

GPX4 suppression is regulated by a repressive complex containing MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 and NCoR. (a) Peak plot showing the ATAC-seq peak at the Gpx4 locus (Chr10: 80051488–80056439) in ovarian tissues from control (Ctrl, blue) and DHEA-treated (DHEA, red) mice. Orange boxes and asterisks denote regions with increased chromatin accessibility. (b) A heatmap displays the top six transcription factors (TFs) binding to the Gpx4 promoter region in the ATAC-seq analysis, along with the mRNA expression identified by RNA-seq analysis, and the predicted TF motifs and E-values are shown on the right. (c) Schematic representation of the Gpx4 promoter region showing the MAZ binding motif relative to the transcription start site (TSS). (Below) MAZ binding footprint enrichment at the Gpx4 locus in Ctrl (blue) and DHEA-treated (red) mice. Primary ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) were treated with 50 μM DHEA for 48 h in vitro to establish the PCOS model. (d) Western blot analysis of MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of one sample per group. Quantification was presented as means ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, Student's t-test. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with isoform-matched immunoglobulin (Ig) or antibodies (IP Ab) to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR, and then immunoprecipitants were assessed for MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR by western blotting reciprocally (the upper panel). The non-IP lysates (Input) were assayed for GAPDH as input controls. (f) Immunofluorescence co-staining was used to determine the expression and localization of MAZ (green), NCoR (red), and HDAC3 (magenta) within GCs. (g) Quantification of protein co-localization from the magnified region in ( f ). (h) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. DHEA-treated GCs were in presence or absence of KCC-07 (KCC, 10 μM, 48 h), and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with isoform-matched immunoglobulin or antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, NCoR, HDAC3, or pan-acetylated lysine (Pan-Ace), respectively. The genomic DNA (Input) and the antibody-bound DNAs were PCR-amplified with primers covering the MAZ motif on Gpx4 promoter. The PCR products of representative sample per group were analyzed on 1.5 % agarose gels. Quantitative analysis was shown on the right. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (i) Western blot analysis. (Left) HDAC3 and GPX4 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs in the presence or absence of the HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 (RGFP, 10 μM, 48 h). (Middle) MAZ and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or MAZ-targeting (si-MAZ) siRNA, followed by treatment with or without DHEA. (Right) NCoR and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or NCoR-targeting (si-NCoR) siRNA, followed by DHEA treatment. GAPDH was as a loading control. (j) Quantifications of ( i ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (k) Schematic model of Gpx4 transcriptional repression. A transcriptional repressive complex orchestrated by MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, and NCoR binds to the hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, leading to transcriptional suppression.

Journal: Redox Biology

Article Title: Methylation reader MBD2-mediated GPX4 transcriptional repression drives ovarian granulosa cell ferroptosis in PCOS

doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104034

Figure Lengend Snippet: GPX4 suppression is regulated by a repressive complex containing MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 and NCoR. (a) Peak plot showing the ATAC-seq peak at the Gpx4 locus (Chr10: 80051488–80056439) in ovarian tissues from control (Ctrl, blue) and DHEA-treated (DHEA, red) mice. Orange boxes and asterisks denote regions with increased chromatin accessibility. (b) A heatmap displays the top six transcription factors (TFs) binding to the Gpx4 promoter region in the ATAC-seq analysis, along with the mRNA expression identified by RNA-seq analysis, and the predicted TF motifs and E-values are shown on the right. (c) Schematic representation of the Gpx4 promoter region showing the MAZ binding motif relative to the transcription start site (TSS). (Below) MAZ binding footprint enrichment at the Gpx4 locus in Ctrl (blue) and DHEA-treated (red) mice. Primary ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) were treated with 50 μM DHEA for 48 h in vitro to establish the PCOS model. (d) Western blot analysis of MAZ, NCoR and HDAC3 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs. GAPDH served as a loading control. Blots are representative of one sample per group. Quantification was presented as means ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, Student's t-test. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with isoform-matched immunoglobulin (Ig) or antibodies (IP Ab) to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR, and then immunoprecipitants were assessed for MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, or NCoR by western blotting reciprocally (the upper panel). The non-IP lysates (Input) were assayed for GAPDH as input controls. (f) Immunofluorescence co-staining was used to determine the expression and localization of MAZ (green), NCoR (red), and HDAC3 (magenta) within GCs. (g) Quantification of protein co-localization from the magnified region in ( f ). (h) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. DHEA-treated GCs were in presence or absence of KCC-07 (KCC, 10 μM, 48 h), and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with isoform-matched immunoglobulin or antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, NCoR, HDAC3, or pan-acetylated lysine (Pan-Ace), respectively. The genomic DNA (Input) and the antibody-bound DNAs were PCR-amplified with primers covering the MAZ motif on Gpx4 promoter. The PCR products of representative sample per group were analyzed on 1.5 % agarose gels. Quantitative analysis was shown on the right. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (i) Western blot analysis. (Left) HDAC3 and GPX4 protein expression in DHEA-treated GCs in the presence or absence of the HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 (RGFP, 10 μM, 48 h). (Middle) MAZ and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or MAZ-targeting (si-MAZ) siRNA, followed by treatment with or without DHEA. (Right) NCoR and GPX4 protein expression in GCs transfected with negative- (si-Ctrl) or NCoR-targeting (si-NCoR) siRNA, followed by DHEA treatment. GAPDH was as a loading control. (j) Quantifications of ( i ). Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (k) Schematic model of Gpx4 transcriptional repression. A transcriptional repressive complex orchestrated by MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3, and NCoR binds to the hypermethylated Gpx4 promoter, leading to transcriptional suppression.

Article Snippet: The lysates of ovaries were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to MBD2 (ab188474, Abcam, UK), MAZ (21068-1-AP, Proteintech, USA), HDAC3 (A19537, ABclonal, China), NCoR (20018-1-AP, Proteintech, USA), or an isotype-matched immunoglobulin (Ig) followed by Protein A/G Magnetic Beads (PB101, Vazyme, China), and then immunoprecipitants were assayed by Western blot with antibodies to MBD2, MAZ, HDAC3 or NCoR, respectively.

Techniques: Control, Binding Assay, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, In Vitro, Western Blot, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Amplification, Transfection